Course Syllabus
Western Civilization I
Fall 2007
Instructor: Scott Gyenes
Number: H 219.81
Hours: 3
Time & Place: Wednesday
630-915pm/ A 200
Office: Humanities 112
Email: sgyenes@ycp.edu
Office phone: 815-6736
Office Hours: Tuesday
530-6:15; Wednesday 530-6:15pm (other times as needed by appointment
** The instructor reserves
the right to alter this syllabus and its assignments and/or readings at any
time.
Course Description: This course
covers the history of the western world, or what is called Western
Civilization, from the earliest human activity through the Reformation era of
the 16th century. This course
will cover the following topics: early
civilizations; ancient
Course Objectives
1. To contribute to students’
understanding of the narrative course of Western Civilization in terms of
continuity and change, cause and effect and its profound influence on our own
society.
2. To contribute to students’
understanding of the interrelationship of Western Civilization and developments
in world history.
3. to contribute to students’
ability to “think like an historian.”
This means that students will comprehend history as an interpretive,
interdisciplinary endeavor, involving not the memorization of dates and facts,
but rather as a synthetic body of knowledge that is constructed out of the
questions we put to the past and the different kinds of evidence we use to
answer those questions.
4. To contribute to students’
understanding of history as a discipline by helping students to develop the
critical thinking skills necessary to analyze primary documents and secondary
sources, including those available on the Web.
5. To contribute to students’
ability to relate to past and present in an analytically appropriate manner
based upon an understanding of the past, the construction of history, and the
use of evidence.
6. To contribute to students’
development of reading, writing, listening, and discussion skills.
Techniques to be used in this course to achive Course
Goals:
1. Students’ analytical and
interpretive abilities, as well as acquisition of content knowledge, will be
assessed via writing assignments, either produced in class or as take home
assignments. Specific forms of
assignments will include in class essay tests, final historical summary paper,
take-home essay final, and primary and secondary source evaluations.
2. Students will develop
communication skills through class discussions, during which students will be
provided with the opportunity to analyze and interpret assigned course
materials.
3. Students will be assigned
a range of materials used by historians to understand the past, including
primary and secondary materials, which may be available in print; as video, art
and/or music; or Web-based information resources. Students will be expected to work with this
material to develop the analytical skill necessary to construct interpretations
and offer arguments backed by evidence drawn from the material.
Basis for Course Grade:
Grades:
Tests: 50%
Quizzes and Source assignments: 25%
Final Project (50pts) 25%
TEST: Essay format
QUIZZES: Short multiple choice questions on text
reading.
SOURCE ASSIGNMENTS:
Assigned readings and
questions from the
FINAL PROJECT:
See Guidelines below.
*The student may elect to
drop the lowest TEST grade
when computing the Final Grade.
Attendance policy: Attendance is your responsibility, not to the
professor, but to yourself. I normally
do not take attendance. However, the
“extra credit” aspect of the course is based upon your attendance. I do not give any “extra” credit assignments
nor round if you have not attended class on a regular basis.
Make up policy: Tests may be made up at the
discretion of the professor.
Final Examinations and Historical Summary Papers MAY
NOT BE MADE UP NOR SUBMITTED LATE.
Statement of Academic Dishonesty of
“Academic dishonest will not
be tolerated at
When an instructor believes
that a student has committed an act of academic dishonesty, the instructor must
provide written notification to the student, the Department Chair, and the Dean
of Academic Affairs or ff the charge and the sanction. Documentation related to instances of
academic dishonest will be kept on file in the student’s permanent record. If the academic dishonesty is the student’s
first offense, the instructor will have the discretion to decide on a suitable
sanction up to a grade of 0 for the
course. Students are not permitted to
withdraw from a course in which they have been accused of academic dishonesty.
Students who believe they
have been unjustly charged or sanctioned in cases involving a first offense
must discuss the situation with the instructor immediately. Following this discussion, students may
request through the Dean of Academic Affairs that the Student Welfare Committee
conduct a hearing to review the charge and/or the sanction in the case. In cases of a first offense, the instructor
may request that the Student Welfare Committee conduct a hearing and decide a
sanction, which can involved academic suspension or dismissal from the College,
if the instructor believes the offense to be of an extremely egregious nature.
If the Dean of Academic
Affairs determines that the academic dishonest is the student’s second offense,
the Dean will provide written notification to the student, the instructor, and the
Department Chair. The Student Welfare
Committee will automatically conduct a hearing to review the charge and decide
on an appropriate sanction, which will involve academic suspension or dismissal
from the College. Students who believe
the Student Welfare Committee has unjustly sanctioned them may submit a written
request to the Dean of Academic Affairs for a review of the case by the Dean.”
Textbook:
Spielvogel, Jackson. Western Civilization: A Brief History
Ø
The textbook is a
substantial aspect of the course. I am
here to teach you, not read to you. The
majority of the lectures should be supplemented with textbook reading. Therefore, to get a better and more complete
picture of the periods under study please read the assigned pages and
participate in class discussions. You
are required to bring the
Grading: The letter grades as defined by the Faculty
Manual of
|
% |
LETTER GRADE |
NUMERICAL GRADE |
MEANING |
|
90-100 |
A |
4 |
EXCELLENT |
|
85-89 |
B+ |
3.5 |
VERY GOOD |
|
80-84 |
B |
3 |
GOOD |
|
75-79 |
C+ |
2.5 |
ABOVE AVERAGE |
|
70-74 |
C |
2 |
AVERAGE |
|
60-69 |
D |
1 |
BELOW AVERAGE |
|
0-59 |
F |
0 |
FAILURE |
4 (Excellent) (90-100): This grade denotes accomplishment that is truly
distinctive and decidedly outstanding. It represents a high degree of
attainment and is a grade that demands evidence of originality, independent
work, an open and discriminating mind, and completeness and accuracy of
knowledge, as well as an effective use of the knowledge.
3.5 (Very Good) (85-89): This grade denotes mastery of the subject matter. It
represents very good achievement in many aspects of the work, such as
initiative, serious and determined industry, the ability to organize work, and
the ability to comprehend and retain subject matter and to apply it to new
problems and contexts.
3 (Good) (80-84): This grade denotes considerable understanding of the subject matter. It
represents a strong grasp and clear understanding of the subject matter and the
ability to comprehend and retain course content.
2.5 (Above Average) (75-79): This grade denotes above average understanding of the
subject matter. It represents a good grasp of the subject matter and the
ability to comprehend and retain course content.
2 (Average) (70-74): This grade denotes average understanding of the
subject matter. It represents the grade that may be expected of a student of
normal ability who gives the work a reasonable amount of time and effort.
1 (Below Average) (60-69): This grade denotes below average understanding of the
subject matter. It represents work that falls below the acceptable standard
0 (Failure) (below 60): This grade denotes inadequate understanding of the
subject matter. It signifies an absence of meaningful engagement with the
subject matter and that the student is not capable of doing or understanding
the work or has made little or no effort to do so.
Statement on Writing Standards: Students enrolled in this course are expected to use
literate and effective English in their speech and writing. All papers and test submitted must be
well-written; grades on written work (including examinations) will be based on
expression well as on content. Students
may be required to rewrite papers which are marred by errors in grammar, punctuation,
spelling, or organization. Source: Faculty Manual, C2.11. If
I can not read your handwriting I will not grade you test/exam.
Final Project Guidelines: 3-5 page
report.
Since the course is a survey
from ca. 50,000 BCE-AD 1500, I do not have the time to cover everything in detail. The Final Project is an opportunity for you
to choose a broad question to answer, in an attempt to get you to learn a
little more, about a topic you find interesting.
FINAL PAPER REQUIRENMENTS:
TENTATIVE COURSE SCHEDULE
August 29: Introduction; Pre-History (read Spievogel
[here after referred to as Text Ch. 1)
September 5: Mesopotamia and
September 12: Near Eastern
Empires and the Hebrews
John Romer: Testament:
In the Beginning
September 19: TEST
Early Aegean World (Text 3 and 4)
September
26: Civilization of the Greeks and Hellenistic
World (text 5 and 6)
October 3:
October 10: Rise and Triumph
of Christianity
October 17: TEST
Heirs to
October 24: Early Middle Ages
(Text 9 and 10)
October 31: High Middle Ages I (Text 11)
November 7: High and Late
Middle Ages
November 14: TEST
The Renaissance I (Text 12)
November 21: No School
November 28: The Renaissance II (Text 13)
*Historical
Summary Due at beginning of class
December 5: The Reformation
December 12: Final
Exam
*If the need arises this syllabus
may be altered at the discretion of the professor.